Advanta IRA Trust – Real Estate IRAs - Educational Posts on Self-Directed IRAs and 1031 Exchanges

Advanta IRA Trust – Real Estate IRAs

Educational Posts on Self-Directed IRAs and 1031 Exchanges

Over the years, there have been several times when a client has been in a perplexing dilemma regarding liquidity of their IRA owned asset and their IRA Required Minimum Distribution (RMD).   At age 70.5 (unless it is a Roth IRA), people are supposed to start pulling money out of their IRA and pay taxes on the distribution.   If they fail to take this RMD, which is based on the value of the account and the age of the IRA holder, there is a 50% penalty (of the RMD amount).  While RMD’s are based on the aggregate of all your IRA’s, regardless of how many custodians you have, the RMD can be taken from any (or all) of the custodians.  It does not need to come out proportionally from each custodian.

    In many cases, our clients have illiquid assets in their accounts, but they just take their RMD from remaining cash and/or another, more liquid, IRA account.   But what happens if a client has a non-liquid asset and no remaining cash or liquid assets to take the RMD?  Well, it isn’t a situation you want to get into, but there is a solution.   You can take the non-liquid asset itself (or portion thereof) as a taxable distribution.

For example, let’s say I am 77 years old and I have an IRA worth $100,000 as of December 31st of 2010.   My 2011 RMD is $4,716.98.   However, I don’t have any cash left in my account.   I only have a piece of real estate valued at $100,000.  I have 3 options.

1)      Do nothing and pay penalties of $2,359 (Not a good option).

2)      Sell the asset and take the RMD from the cash (Is market suitable for sale?).

3)      Take the asset out of the IRA (or portion thereof) as a taxable distribution.

In this case, I opt for option three.   I have an appraisal prepared and fill out my IRA administrator’s distribution form.  I also have a deed prepared issuing 5% of the $100,000 property to myself.   So now, rather than the IRA owning 100% of the property, the IRA owns 95%, while I own 5% personally. The IRA administrator will report to the IRS (and client) that a distribution of $5,000 occurred. This is a taxable event, even though I did not receive any cash.  I received $5,000 in value instead.

As I said, this is probably not a situation you want to get involved with.  There are expenses associated each year this is done (i.e. new appraisal annually and new deed preparation annually).   The client could opt to remove the asset in a shorter time frame (i.e. 25% over 4 years).  However, the taxable implications would potentially be higher if the distributions occur in a shorter time frame.   It is best to talk to your financial advisor or CPA before deciding how much of a distribution is best for you.   A little planning ahead can usually go a long way in keeping situations like this from arising.  However, it is nice to know there is an option for those stuck in this dilemma.

Brandon Hall, CISP is IRA Director at AdvantaIRA Trust, LLC and  can be reached at 239-333-1031 or hall@AdvantaIRATrust.com.

4 Responses

  1. Disclosure Agreement Says:

    What?s Happening i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve discovered It positively useful and it has helped me out loads. I’m hoping to give a contribution & help other users like its aided me. Good job.

    Posted on September 12th, 2011 at 2:49 pm

  2. traffic school reviews Says:

    Pretty nice post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to mention that I’ve really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I will be subscribing for your feed and I hope you write once more very soon!

    Posted on March 6th, 2012 at 9:27 am

  3. Jonathan Kramer Says:

    What is your basis for saying this is not a prohibited transaction?

    Posted on August 3rd, 2012 at 6:32 pm

  4. admin Says:

    Prohibited transactions are created when financial components come into play. For example, the purchase/sale of an asset between the IRA owner and a disqualified party is prohibited. In the case, there is no monetary exchange. The client is simply removing an asset from their account the same way they could remove (distribute) cash. They are not purchasing the asset from the IRA. They are distributing it from the IRA and paying applicable taxes. Any potential taxes owed are based on the asset value at the time of the distribution. The IRS put probitied transaction rules in place to protect the integrity of the IRA and prevent “sweatheart” deals meant to avoid or lower taxes owed. This transaction doesn’t avoid taxation as the client is paying taxes on the appraised value at the time of the distribution.

    Posted on August 14th, 2012 at 11:00 am

Leave a Reply